Conquest for the devil

+

J.M.J.T.

Feast of Christ the King

The Holy Church prays today that “all the kindred of the nations… may be brought under the sweet yoke” of the rule and dominion of Christ the King since God “hast willed to restore all things” in Him through His Son Our Lord Jesus Christ. And see how could she be distinguished in her prayer, nay the Spirit of Truth pleading in her, from the desire of the pseudo-Church of infiltrated Freemasons and Communists (cf., our post “The Year 1929”) to accommodate itself to the phenomenological ‘situation’ and the Modernist ‘experience’ of de-Christianized man as it was reflected in the last so-called ‘Roman Synod’  - the true holy Catholic Church, purified down to the prophesied Resistance remnant, acknowledges the one same old problem underlying all the upheavals of the perverted ‘Modernist’ man: the division in and around him “by the wound of sin” (Collect of today’s Mass) with its concomitant rotten stench of the basest moral perversions.

God the Father… hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the Saints in light (from today’s Lesson, Col. 1.12-20). The diabolical “Vatican II-Church” of dissimulation pretends to draw the ‘Modern’ man to the Catholic fold yet makes a mockery of the light – dismissing the Traditionalist insistence on the fundamental of dogmatic truth as “hostile inflexibility” (the Antipope Bergoglio) and challenging God to His face for His being the sole and final arbiter of good and evil, opposed as He would ever be to the invention of an ‘opinionated egalitarian free/liberal man’ of today inebriated by the 1789 Masonic poison of the ‘Rights of Man’: ‘there’s nothing wrong in me; I am not wounded by sin ; and, I cannot be a miser living in sin” – pressed to its logical conclusion: he did not need the salvation offered by God through the Crucified… making peace through the Blood of His Cross, both as to the things on earth, and the things that are in heaven.

Nothing definitive actually came out of the so-called ‘Synod’ but one thing is conclusive – in the mindset of the Vatican II pseudo-Church ‘president’, the Antipope Bergoglio, ‘the way, the truth, and the life’ of the ‘modernist effeminate man’ in his situation and experience hold the primacy… in all things; not the irrevocable rights and judgment of the King of kings and Lord of lords thundering from the Cross. 

All kings shall adore Him, all nations shall serve Him (from the Gradual of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, Ps. 71.8,11). This is the true Catholic conquest of souls under the banner of the Crucified and the Immaculata. Let us resist the Antipope and his pseudo-Church in their mad conquest for the devil whose 100-year permission is now drawing fast to its terrible close. 

A most blessed Feast to everyone!

Pseudo-Neo-Catholic Church of Vatican II Bares Its Self-Destruction

+

J.M.J.

Solemn Feast of La Madre Teresa of Jesus

Virgin and Reformer of the Carmelite Order

“… Reflect,” says St. Teresa of Jesus, “on the great damage parents do by not striving that their children might always see virtuous deeds of every kind” (Life, Ch. II).  But what more of parents who consent to their gay children in abandoning themselves into “the basest moral depravity” (St. John Chrysostom in our post, "Our Lady, Vatican Disorientation, and the Annihilation of Many Nations") there is which even the dumbest beast would not dare venture in, beholden as it is to the Natural Law not by reason but by mere instinct! And they deserved a warm applause by the so-called ‘Roman Synod’ patres under the ‘presidency’ of the greatest jerk-antipope (why Bergoglio is not the true Pope: "Sagittam Electam" - on the "Declaratio" of 'resignation' read by Pope Benedict XVI) there ever was! That the ‘Synod’ now welcome homosexuals abominably living together with children being raised by them should no longer be a surprise. This should unequivocally speak of how far the ‘official’ institutional mainstream Neo-Catholicism (the “pseudo-[Catholic] Church” of infiltrated Freemasons and Communists, cf., our post “The Year 1929” and “APerilous ‘Catholic' Voyage”) has already gone beyond redemption, its remedy being but its extirpation from the face of the earth by God’s direct intervention (cf., our post “The Chastisement Closes In”; see also “On the Numberof Sins Beyond Which God Pardons No More”).

According to the measure in which the love of God takes possession of our heart, it creates and nourishes in us an ever increasing love for our neighbor; but this love, being supernatural, seeks only the supernatural good of our fellow men and thus becomes zeal for the salvation of souls.

All that God does is also for man’s eternal good and therefore for man’s eternal happiness. But we should long to have some share in this action, knowing that we can do nothing which will be more pleasing to God than to lend our humble collaboration for the salvation of those who are so dear to Him – not for their eternal misery in hell with the devils.

Zeal for souls finds its source in the contemplation of Christ and Him Crucified (1 Cor. 1.23; 2.2) – in distinction to theNeo-Christ of Vatican II’s Neo-Catholic THEOlogy whom the bastard ‘Synod’ mentioned to be gazed at while they diabolically look into the destruction of the Church’s basic unit, the family . His wounds, His Blood, the excruciating agony, all tell us how much God values souls and how dearly He loves them. But his love is unrequited – or, yes, requited yet with such utter mockery of God and of His Church.

"Shun all the wiles of the devil..."

+

J.M.J.

Feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary of the Holy Rosary

"Grant, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that Thy faithful may shun all the wiles of the devil..."

(Collect of the Mass, last Sunday, 17th after Pentecost)

"‪Catholic‬ Resistance"-‪‎ManilaPH Being Persecuted By Its Former Manila 'Coordinatrix'-Benefactress

Let our PH friends and readers be warned against this impious woman and her 'visionary' group (with connections to the so-called ‪"God the Father Movement"‬) who's been going bitterly against the Seminary Community, especially against the senior Seminarian who exposed and denounced her to Fr. Chazal who in turn upheld him. To help "get the whole picture" and thus to do away with the malicious lying intrigues of her and her party, we quote the official report ---

"Mrs. [Basilisa, aka 'Julie'] Cordova's madness sprung over mere suspicion on Fr. Pfeiffer's having been sold to [an adverse] proposal [by a faithful who had a falling off with her] for our transfer. This was triggered when Fr. Pfeiffer, coming from Iloilo, contacted Fr. Suelo to go up to the airport in Manila for a meeting. Mrs. Cordova challenged the said arrangement arguing why Fr. Pfeiffer would rather not head straight here unless they wanted to go with William and see another possible site for the Seminary. I reproved her in that such arrangement between the Fathers is not even for her scrutiny and that she was already imputing 'wrongdoing' over mere suspicion. Her only reply was that she has yet to prove herself wrong whenever she would go with her inkling. She added, "If you leave, I would rather be happy but don't expect me to follow them."

When I informed her over the phone of Fr. Suelo's plan of spending the night at her house in Malate for the next morning meet with Fr. Pfeiffer, it was she who rather "very rude[ly]" [to quote her partisan, Rommel dela Rosa] and contemptuously expressed how she would treat even sacred persons in conflict with her decision over her suspicion, saying angrily, "No! He is not welcome here. I am not going to accept him here. If he wants to meet with Pfeiffer, tell him to take an early morning ride there to the airport!" And when our entering Seminarian from Liloan, Leyte first met her, Mrs. Cordova's opening salvo to him was, "Where will you stay now that I am expelling them from here?" [The incoming Seminarian] was taken aback, he "did not know what to say at her rudeness." Now she had the gall to say, "I wonder what kind of formation and training your priests received," and chide us for [being ungratefully disrespectful] over the following "need to be informed" thing even of matters and affairs proper only to an Ecclesiastical Superior of whom she is not :

In the afternoon of Fr. Pfeiffer's meet with Fr. Suelo, he was able to get hold of Mrs. Cordova over the phone for a late afternoon or early evening Mass in Malate. However, Fr. Pfeiffer told me that it was turned down by Mrs. Cordova because the schedule was not convenient and in all possibility, only one could make it. Fr. Pfeiffer rang her up again to finally call it off altogether as he could not make it anymore besides. Many times did he dial up Mrs. Cordova's numbers - both landline AND MOBILE - but she would not pick up though, as Father surmised, she could not be somewhere otherwise. Later in the evening, she sent me a text message to check whether both Fathers had already gone back here to Batangas because she called up faithful for the Mass and prepared food, then Fr. Pfeiffer did not show up "with no sms message sent and NO CALLS WHATSOEVER [lie];" her conclusion: "Fr. Pfeiffer would just like to get me embarrassed before the faithful." Fr. Pfeiffer noted here a "battle plan" prepared by Mrs. Cordova against him for a division between you and him. It seems to me our Manila 'Coordinatrix' manipulated this affair to the discredit of Fr. Pfeiffer over, again, her suspicion.

Fr. Pfeiffer stayed with us for three days and one night. The third day, a Friday, he took us out to Makati after lunch. Mrs. Cordova came over after we had already left and complained that we did not inform her that we were going out - a couple of times, after the [adverse faithful] affair in which she was also accused of meddling in things which ecclesiastical norms forbid her to have a 'say' whatsoever notwithstanding her being a key benefactor, she declared to me that she has already let ["not give"] her house to be "the house of God;" now, if they say we are "bypassing" her [claims a partisan of her, Rommel dela Rosa] then what is demanded of us is not mere 'courtesy information' but, contrary to what she rhetorically demands, an obligation to report, as to a Seminary superior, for her consideration and regulation as she insolently insisted on with Fr. Pfeiffer-Fr. Suelo arrangement referred to previously. On this point, I challenged her, "So where do we put the demarcation line: where does 'your house' end and the house of God begin?" The clarification I gave her was if we were to use her house for other purpose other than a religious one or if we were to introduce modifications or changes in her property then we are not only bound to "inform her" but also to ask her permission. However, instead of coming down from the heights of her bloated pride and acknowledge that in truth she has no case over her imagined need to be "informed" of our strictly Seminary affairs and activities in and out, she'd rather save her face and proceeded, "If that's the case, then you rent my house for PESOS 60,000 a month so that you can come and go as you please for this is still my house." How rotten is her sense of 'justice' gone, thinking deludedly that with all the resources merely entrusted to her by Divine Providence she has been given with it a position with which she could insolently offer such a shamelessly impious insult to clerics who refused to bow down to her irreligious whim! And at that Sunday 'meeting' she hosted, a faithful named Ligaya remarked on her rental 'threat': "They will come then before you begging on their knees." Interestingly, Mrs. Cordova added also last Friday to her rental 'threat', "Or, I may not allow anymore your Mass in my house" : in giving in to madness she would claim her nature is already used to, she does not know anymore what exactly is the 'penalty' for which. To continue, Father, the story on that Friday afternoon, I sent her a text message during our recreation to inform her that Fr. Pfeiffer would like to see her in Malate in the evening to which she replied, "Why did you show him my messages [in which she would refer to him no longer as Fr. Pfeiffer but as "JP" and imputed malice over Father's failed show-up]?" - I did not mind about showing them anymore in fact. So she knew well that she had gone overboard but then: when we finished our dinner late, I messaged her that Father would not be able to make it anymore as he needed to head straight to the airport; she it was who still managed to get the nerve of impudently replying, "Let him not show himself to me anymore."

Later at night or already past midnight, I received a text message from her that some faithful were requesting the Sunday Mass be held in Malate and added, "since Fr. Suelo is fond of wandering out anyways" (Mrs. Cordova lied at the meeting she convoked below telling the attendees that Fr. Suelo was in Manila for three consecutive days amusing himself). The following morning, she sent again a text message informing me that already, "majority of the faithful [coincidentally] wanted to go home early after the Sunday Mass" - however, there are faithful who, when they needed to go home early, leave after the Mass and no longer stay for lunch with us. I insisted that the Mass be held in Batangas as Fr. Suelo needed rest in preparation for our weeklong-trip to Mindanao-Visayas missions with Fr. Pfeiffer which specific reason I did not mention to her anymore except that we need to prepare for it. On this, Mrs. Cordova mentioned to me last Friday that she and Mrs. Simon were wondering what things would take us for a preparation that denied the request of her coordinating 'office'. So she implies that our considerations in administering the sacred be scrutinized by them and if it seems 'unreasonable' to them... please refer to the end of this paragraph, Father. Mrs. Cordova thought, and rightly, that it must be me who decided to have the Mass here because "Fr. Suelo will not say no." That, in connection with her "since..." in the text message above, showing again her contemptuous attitude against a priest whom they consider to be, in the terms [the adverse faithful above] first referred to Fr. Elijah, 'DRAGgable' ('kaladkarin' in local idiom), was the second reason why I denied her request. Then, Mrs. Cordova also did not go down anymore that Sunday morning. Interestingly, [a faithful young man] informed me that Mrs. Cordova called him to a meeting in her house that same Sunday morning and the meeting even lasted until the afternoon - "need to go home early?" A faithful, who asks not to be named, notified me by email that over phone conversation with Mrs. Cordova early that same Sunday afternoon, among other things she was griping about, she 'threatened', "If they cannot follow our requests, they can now get out of there!"

Mrs. Cordova came down also last Friday with Ms. Matti, the 'visionary', and two others [Susan Tempra, and a lady named Telen] who form her group. Ms. Matti's piece: we were "disrespectful" towards our host-benefactor in following Fr. Pfeiffer. And when she said, "Yes, Fr. Pfeiffer is the Superior BUT DOES HE PROVIDE FOR YOU HERE...," I challenged her also "to [her] face" (Gal. 2.11) for this deluded proud spirit would rather have a benefactor's whim be given preference [than true Catholic obedience to a legitimate Superior]. Taking what she erroneously considers to be of weightier matter, I called them to account: what comparison is there between what they're boasting of and a single Mass offered for them. They have forgotten that whatever it is they are boasting of now is nothing before God and that God reduces to nothing all our proud works. But it seems it did not matter to them for when [the faithful young man] asked Mrs. Cordova during the meeting she convoked, "to whom will you go for Mass and other Sacraments" given that we all are now worthless before their eyes (Ms. Matti zeroed in also your two-month absence as tantamount to abandoning your seminarians - the 'visionary' failed to 'see' so I tried to enlightened her regarding the circumstances of our canonical vacation), the ‪Sedevacantist‬ CMRI came up but since the said Sedevacantists refuse to go here and would refer them instead to Fr. Soliman whom they do not 'like', the 'visionary' spoke thus, "we were told that if there are no more priests to whom we should go, then we can already go straight to [g]od..." - the 'spirit' behind Protestantism. And so she continued, this time taking it out on Fr. Suelo (who defied Mrs. Cordova in going up still to Manila to meet with Fr. Pfeiffer) according to the complaints of Fr. Onoda which, she claimed, she learned from a woman who inquired with the mainstream-‪SSPX‬ OLVC Prior for his whereabouts. The 'visionary' would like us to 'see' that Fr. Suelo is a great financial liability if we leave Mrs. Cordova's house and that since, according to Fr. Onoda, he is a recalcitrant subordinate he is as good as dumped. So, to shut her up and finally end the discussion with them, I remarked: "St. Teresa said: 'Even if a priest be a sinner, I will still kiss his footsteps.' Dump your clerics when they turn apostates, heretics, schismatics but not because you perceive them as 'offending' your 'righteous' sensibilities. And as to our renting out or not this house or to the discontinuance of the Mass here, and as to your murmurings against our decisions on the administration of the sacred and on our getting in and out of the Seminary, let Fr. Chazal settle it."

Later in the afternoon, Mrs. Cordova went all the way through in perpetrating in the Seminary cloister even up to our rooms (except Fr. Suelo's which, I was told by our lady-helpers, was locked) their superstitious ritual of swinging incense to drive away, in her proud presumption, the remaining evil spirits who, she claimed, came with [the adverse faithful] and who now have been taking hold of us so that we finally get 'enlightened'! She was an ex-[‪Augustinian Recollect‬]nun and claiming to be 'traditional' she must know that that kind of shameless irreverent stupidity cannot pass without them having incurred a canonical punishment [it is our lady-helpers who rather have a Catholic sense for they dreaded that such forbidden absurdity occured; they believe that God will punish them for it]. And in virtue of the Order of Porter conferred upon me, shall I bar those impiously deluded proud spirits from sacred ceremony until we see them "begging [pardon and absolution] on their bended knees?" The 'visionary', I was told, then claimed that she saw the remaining proud spirits scampering away - I recall her relating one time that when she saw devils surrounding a mainstream-SSPX priest at an airport where she happened to be waiting, she ran away out of fear for them: but St. Therese also saw devils and these proud spirits were the ones who scampered away from her trembling; according to St. Teresa, if we pray well we can not be fearful of devils. Mrs. Cordova and party left taking away with them the red and green vestments which came from Mrs. [Babes Simon].

The following day, during lunch, I was told that they expected me to just sit down before them keeping mum while Mrs. Cordova and the 'visionary' were spewing the same impious murmurings with which they have already maliciously intrigued with other faithful, and then of course "beg [for their indulgence] on bended knees." But sorry for them last Friday, I did not - and will not! They forgot that a cleric sitting before them occupies a position higher than what they pretend to be and a Porter of the "house of God" would not tolerate their shamelessly impudent and impious mouths in dealing with and speaking of us so I refuted and reproved them accordingly. One of them commented to our lady-helpers, "He hasn't become a priest yet, what more..." To which I would reply: What more if I become a priest? I will deal just as God dealt severely with proud murmurers as of Old" [emphases, ours with those supplied in the original].

Fr. Chazal decided to abandon the woman's house and appointed 8th of September for the Community's transfer. He tasked the senior Seminarian to take charge of the transfer as he would be away for the scheduled Korea-Japan mission run and instructed to "save whatever you can [that is liturgically necessary for the Seminary]." However, later in the day, the impious woman charged the senior Seminarian in the local community blotter with 'theft' formally claiming that the altar cross, sanctuary images of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart, the tabernacle, censer, ciborium, and missal stand received by the Superior as donations "all belong to [her]" while later would circulate text messages to the effect that she was actually trying to get even for the adverse effect of the Seminarian's report on her repute in that "he was wrong in going against a tiger." Her impious claim was a lie for her means of demanding back what "belong[s] to [her]" was by harassment of the weak and poor (she's an 'effeminate' "tiger" after all with tail actually tucked in between hind legs!) - her poor tenants who served the Community and even offered help to the Seminary to get a temporary house and thus make the priests and seminarians stay near them were threatened with outright expulsion from her property had they failed to get everything she specified on her demand note! This coward also instructed her tenants to noise abroad that the Community - especially the senior Seminarian - were 'thieves'; but, when the locals of the subdivision learned of what she did, only then did they know that she was actually a "rotten lying hypocrite" - a neighbor active in the Novus Ordo parish denounced her with loathing to the N.O. "presider". Well, these N.O. devoted faithful exhibited themselves to be in possession still, somehow, of sound Catholic sense than this impudent deluded woman who claimed before the Resistance priests and seminarians that she saw the 'Blessed Virgin' one time in her property during the first marriage for the ResistancePH - but only the devil would have this kind of impious effect of her deceitful 'apparition'! And to buttress her allegation that she was robbed, she now has resorted to a lie: that her house was only for her 'retreat house' and not a seminary.

The next morning after the transfer, the 'effeminate' "tiger" instructed the chief of the local community police to demand also from the Seminarian the chalice bought by Fr. Pfeiffer with a threat that the local community police would cross beyond their area of jurisdiction and extend their arms on behalf of the political 'corruptrix'. The Seminarian challenged them to come up rather with a rightful court order from which the deluded impious spirit backed off for she would not be able to present to the court any evidence proving that Fr. Pfeiffer's chalice "belongs to [her]."

Fr. Chazal, over a phone conversation with his senior Seminarian, claimed that that deluded woman was actually the one "robbing" the community and since what she was able to get back by harassment were devoted to the sanctuary and the altar the 'effeminate' "tiger" "committed," continued Fr. Chazal, "ABOMINATION." The Church, according to St. Pius X-Pope Benedict XV Code of Canon Law, punishes her and her partisans who urged her and would defend her impious usurpation of ecclesiastical property with EXCOMMUNICATION LATAE SENTENTIAE - that is, AUTOMATIC EXCOMMUNICATION - and its absolution reserved to the Holy See (good 'luck' to her and her partisans with the present "diabolical disorientation" of Rome).

"Fire will fall from heaven..." - The Great Chastisement Closes In

+

J.M.J.

First Saturday of the Month

Father Constant Louis Marie PEL (1876–1966) is not a name well-known among the souls gifted by God with a knowledge of how God is going to set today’s world straight, but for those who knew him he was a priest very close to God. Doctor in theology, seminary professor, founder of a convent for women and of a seminary for men, with a great devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, he was a personal friend of Padre Pio who said of him to some French pilgrims in San Giovanni Rotondo, “Why do you come to see me when you have so great a Saint in France?”

Fr Pel would spend nights on his feet in church with his forehead leaning against the Tabernacle, conversing with God in a permanent ecstasy. He died in a car accident just after Vatican II, but not before a seminarian, one of his spiritual sons, had been able to note down a prophecy of his, dating from 1945, concerning the chastisement which will strike France in particular. Here it is, quoted or abbreviated:--

“My son,” said Fr Pel, “know that with the sins of the world increasing in horror as this age wears on, great punishments from God will come down on the world and no continent will be spared by the Wrath of God. France being guilty of apostasy and denying its vocation will be severely chastised. East of a line stretching from Bordeaux in the south-west to Lille in the north-east, everything will be laid waste and set on fire by peoples invading from the east, and also by great flaming meteorites falling in a rain of fire upon all the earth and upon these regions especially. Revolution, war, epidemics, plagues, chemical poison gases, violent earthquakes and the re-awakening of France’s extinct volcanoes will destroy everything . .

“France to the west of that line will be less affected . . . because of the faith rooted in the Vendée and in Brittany . . . but any of God’s worst enemies seeking refuge there from the worldwide cataclysm will be found out, wherever they hide, and put to death by devils, because the Wrath of the Lord is just and holy. Thick darkness caused by the war, gigantic fires and fragments of burning stars falling for three days and nights will cause the sun to disappear, and only candles blessed on Candlemas (February 2) will give light in the hands of believers, but the godless will not see this miraculous light because they have darkness in their souls.

“In this way, my son, three quarters of mankind will be destroyed, and in certain parts of France survivors will have to go 60 miles to find another live human being . . . . Several nations will disappear off the face of the map . . . . A France thus purified will become the renewed “Eldest Daughter of the Church,” because all the Cains and Judases will have disappeared in this ‘Judgment upon the Nations’”. This Judgment is not yet the end of times, but so great is the punishment due to the sins of the nations that Our Lord told Fr Pel that the desolation at world’s end will be lesser.

Dear readers, what do we conclude? Let each of us strive with might and main, and with the help of the true Catholic sacraments (see "Catholic Resistance" Mass Centers) given to us by God for that purpose, to live in God’s grace and not in the state of sin, and let us make full use of the time he gives us between now and the Hour of his Justice to pray for the largest possible number of sinners to repent and save their souls for eternity when the Chastisement closes in. God, have mercy. Mary, help.

Kyrie eleison.
Bishop R. Williamson

See also: "Our Lady, Vatican II Disorientation, and the Annihilation of Many Nations"

Our delightful wound in God's Heart

+

J.M.J.

Feast of Our Dear "Little Therese"

Virgin of the Order of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel

Come from Libanus.... thou hast wounded My Heart,

My sister, My spouse, thou hast wounded My Heart

(from the Introit of the Mass, Cant. 4.8,9)

The delightful wound with which God draws us to our place in His Heart:

"The Little Way of Spiritual Childhood of St. Therese - Humility (III)"

A most blessed Feast to everyone!